Freckles & Doubt (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
freckles_and_doubt) wrote2008-12-04 03:20 pm
freckles_and_doubt) wrote2008-12-04 03:20 pm
Entry tags:
eeek!
This job possibly requires danger pay. A student has just phoned me in the usual panic. I checked her record and told her that as far as I can work out she's not about to be academically excluded and should be able to continue studying next year, whereupon she let out this express-train shriek of joy that went through my skull like an electric fish-skewer and may actually have perforated my eardrum. Matters were not improved by the fact that I celebrated stress, tension and overwork by becoming Naughtily Drunk while playing Munchkin last night, and am hungover. Thanks, joyous student. Glad you're happy. Now send painkillers.
I have earlier vouchsafed to the universe my views on the Twilight teen vampire series, which I persist in believing is a stale, flat and extremely profitable piece of no-content, high-sugar literary junk food whose most redeeming feature to date is its ability to make me realise that for a given value of "write" JK Rowling actually isn't as bad as all that. Therefore this article is interesting, setting out as it does to explain why Twilight's schlocky dreck, or drecky schlock, is so irresistibly mesmerising to teenaged girls. Or, in fact, older than teenaged girls: I keep running across blog posts where twenty- and thirty-something commenters discuss the fact that they hate the books and think they're dreadful but can't help reading. I hated them but have read the first three. It may, in fact, be the case that they're speaking to some weird, buried adolescent girlness I thought I'd outgrown. Damn those vampires and their symbolic power, anyway.
I have earlier vouchsafed to the universe my views on the Twilight teen vampire series, which I persist in believing is a stale, flat and extremely profitable piece of no-content, high-sugar literary junk food whose most redeeming feature to date is its ability to make me realise that for a given value of "write" JK Rowling actually isn't as bad as all that. Therefore this article is interesting, setting out as it does to explain why Twilight's schlocky dreck, or drecky schlock, is so irresistibly mesmerising to teenaged girls. Or, in fact, older than teenaged girls: I keep running across blog posts where twenty- and thirty-something commenters discuss the fact that they hate the books and think they're dreadful but can't help reading. I hated them but have read the first three. It may, in fact, be the case that they're speaking to some weird, buried adolescent girlness I thought I'd outgrown. Damn those vampires and their symbolic power, anyway.
no subject
Most recently, the poor actor cast as the sparkly vampire has stopped even vaguely pretending that he doesn't find the franchise horrendous and more than slightly creepy.
Teenage girls lap it up for the same reason they lap up nearly identical Mary Sue fanfiction written by their peers on the internet. It's emotional porn. Reviewing it like a normal book is a little like criticising mainstream porn movies for having poor plotting, bad acting and a lack of characterisation. But at least people who watch crappy porn don't passionately claim that it's awesome moviemaking.
Now, if mainstream comic book publishers stopped wringing their hands and debating "what girls like" for five minutes, and looked at what is right in front of them, they could make a killing. Mary Sue + Vampires = epic profits for ever. ;)
no subject
So far absolutely the best take on Twilight that I've seen is by the Fug girls (http://gofugyourself.celebuzz.com/go_fug_yourself/2008/12/fuglight.html), who have snark down to a slightly flamboyant laser-scalpel art.