Date: Wednesday, 1 July 2009 03:52 pm (UTC)
I suspect it's about the legal definition of "discriminate". You may have to show some specific practical disadvantage caused by it. That doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a groovy lawsuit waiting to happen, though.

Tangentially, I would really enjoy it if there were some legal route to force hatemongers (or any other kind of dumbmongers) to provide evidence for their claims, failing which they'd be officially labelled as rubbish. I know, sounds a lot like science, and the idea that that should form the basis for public policy is of course hopeless fantasy.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Page generated Thursday, 19 June 2025 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit