hot rum toddies
Thursday, 31 May 2007 10:29 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... now the drink of choice for (a) my cold, currently also being enjoyed by stv and the Evil Landlord, (b) the wall-to-wall diet of pirates in the last few days, and (c) stv. We have flattened an entire bottle of Spiced Gold since Tuesday.
I think my response to Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End is perfectly summed up by my experience of a small near-incident upon leaving the theatre: distracted by the particularly nice Johnny Depp shot on the poster ...

... I nearly walked into one of those big, metal, bolt-studded pillars the Waterfront cinema carelessly leaves lying around all over the place. The films actually have a stellar cast, Orli's approximately 2-degree range notwithstanding, but really they're about Jack Sparrow, who has to be quite one of the most compelling and endearing collections of mannerisms and foibles ever to grace the Hollywood screen, particularly given the packaging in a pleasingly lean form with high cheekbones. Apparently fired to new heights by this inalienable fact, the film's scriptwriters clearly asked themselves, "What makes people watch these films?" and, receiving the simple answer "Johnny Depp", set out to give us more of him. Multiple copies. All over the screen, being endearingly mad. The mind truly boggles at the thought of the Jack/Jack slash, or even the Jack/Jack/Jack/Jack/Jack slash, that will certainly result.
Things I Liked About The Film:
I don't think I follow the normal critical rules when watching movies - I seem to judge them on the level of storytelling, firmly within genre. World's End is by no means a great film in absolute terms, but as a genre piece in the fluffbuckling mode, it's pretty darned effective and bloody good fun to watch. Also, pretty men. Yes, I'm shallow.
I think my response to Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End is perfectly summed up by my experience of a small near-incident upon leaving the theatre: distracted by the particularly nice Johnny Depp shot on the poster ...
... I nearly walked into one of those big, metal, bolt-studded pillars the Waterfront cinema carelessly leaves lying around all over the place. The films actually have a stellar cast, Orli's approximately 2-degree range notwithstanding, but really they're about Jack Sparrow, who has to be quite one of the most compelling and endearing collections of mannerisms and foibles ever to grace the Hollywood screen, particularly given the packaging in a pleasingly lean form with high cheekbones. Apparently fired to new heights by this inalienable fact, the film's scriptwriters clearly asked themselves, "What makes people watch these films?" and, receiving the simple answer "Johnny Depp", set out to give us more of him. Multiple copies. All over the screen, being endearingly mad. The mind truly boggles at the thought of the Jack/Jack slash, or even the Jack/Jack/Jack/Jack/Jack slash, that will certainly result.
Things I Liked About The Film:
- Overall, its pace, sweep and general sense of adventure and fun, nicely balanced with dark bits. The opening sequence with the hangings, while gratuitously over-the-top, was very effective.
- The very surreal sequences in World's End itself - some amazing visuals.
- The crabs.
- The doomed love between the giant sea goddess with a Jamaican accent and the immortal underwater pirate captain with an octopus on his head. It was surprisingly real.
- Orli trying to be dark and angsty. You want to pat him on the head and feed him cookies, or something.
- Davy Jones playing the organ with his tentacles. This charmed me in the second film, and hasn't stopped any.
- The completely bizarre and fanciful things Jack Sparrow does with language. I'm so an English geek.
- Poor old Commander Norrington's redemption-by-death. I do like Norrington.
- The mid-battle proposal and marriage ceremony. Endearingly silly. Also, I have to add, the incredibly Errol-Flynnish flourish Will Turner gives to grabbing his lady and kissing her thereafter. Iconic.
- Johnny Depp, plus supporting cast, flying around on the end of a rope to considerable slapstick effect. Yay slapstick.
- Aspects of the scripting: while I didn't find the huge numbers of plot holes I was expecting, it was a sprawling, self-indulgent script that badly lacked elegance. Most events actually had an explanation, but the justifications felt tacked-on and over-elaborate rather than arising from inherent logic.
- Lack of sufficient feel-good narrative payoff, essential for this kind of movie. I'm not big with the doomed separation of Will and Elizabeth for ten years. They're such a pair of dopes, they deserve something more saccharine. Either that, or
first_fallen is infecting me, and I'm unable to contemplate with equanimity the idea of ten years of forcible separation from Orli's torso.
- The whirlpool. Cute for about three seconds, but it went nowhere and did nothing. Cool visual effects are not an end in themselves.
- The lack of resolution of the Davy Jones/Calypso romance. I want to know what happened, dammit! I was rooting for them.
- The bit with the brain. Eeeuw.
I don't think I follow the normal critical rules when watching movies - I seem to judge them on the level of storytelling, firmly within genre. World's End is by no means a great film in absolute terms, but as a genre piece in the fluffbuckling mode, it's pretty darned effective and bloody good fun to watch. Also, pretty men. Yes, I'm shallow.
Orlipool - kinda spoilery
Date: Thursday, 31 May 2007 09:30 pm (UTC)The whirlpool was one of the best bits, I think. It was just so damn cool. I want me a Flying Dutchman, barnacles and all.
* Not as awesome in this one (don't kill me, Schedule 5!). He was kinda fluffy and didn't seem to have a point beyond "driving" the "plot" (read: herding the cats). Too much of a good thing? He seemed somewhat watered down, if you'll pardon the pun.
Re: Orlipool - kinda spoilery
Date: Friday, 1 June 2007 01:18 pm (UTC)The bit where the Flying Dutchman surges up out of the water is always incredibly cool.
Pretty Men
Date: Friday, 1 June 2007 07:44 am (UTC)I haven't seen the film yet, so can't refute
Re: Pretty Men
Date: Friday, 1 June 2007 03:58 pm (UTC)